Not long after my last presentation on my book and human
trafficking, one of my parishioners let me know how horrified she is that she
has around 100 slaves working for her.
She figured this out by looking at slaveryfootprint.org, an excellent
website to learn more about how we can tangibly reduce our slavery footprint
(like a carbon footprint). My wife said
the same thing when she discovered that she had over fifty. Some of the questions are hard to answer
accurately or refer to one-time purchases and may skew the actual result, but
the conclusion remains the same: OH NO!
The purpose of slaveryfootprint.org is not to alarm
you. The purpose is to inform you. Of course, your alarm serves a purpose, too,
in that once you see how terrifying your slavery footprint is you’ll be more
likely to want to change. The website
then gives you a bunch of detail on what goes into your slavery footprint so
that you can adjust your lifestyle and choices accordingly.
Even then the number will probably remain high. I suppose that I am slightly more
simplicity-oriented in life and slightly more informed on slavery than the
average Westerner, and so I have made slight adjustments to reduce my slavery
footprint, and yet I still have thirty-seven or slaves working for me. At the end of the day, even if we entirely
remake our lives to limit our footprint, we probably won’t eliminate our
footprint until we also influence society to remake itself. That’s an unfortunate truth, but we know it’s
true looking at how we reduce our carbon footprint. If we ride our bikes everywhere we go, don’t
use electricity or have solar panels that cover our electric usage, and have
geothermal systems to heat and cool our homes, we’d still have a carbon
footprint (which is sad, considering how expansive and demanding these changes
to our lives I’ve listed are). How? Well, where do we buy our food? Is it all local? If not—and it’s almost surely not because in
most places it’s actually impossible to only buy local and still eat anywhere
near healthy—then we have a carbon footprint because our food had to be
transported. Dangit! We’d then have to change the way our society
produces and distributes food to completely eliminate our footprint. One example of at least a handful. Another example: do we use paper? If yes, is
it hemp paper? If no, and it’s paper
made from wood, then we are contributing to the rise in carbon dioxide in the
environment because trees breathe on carbon dioxide. Moral of the story is simple: we must make
radical changes to our own lives and also make radical changes to how society
operates.
Moral of the moral: go to slaveryfootprint.org and learn
how you can make a difference with, often, simple life changes. Find out how many slaves are working for you
and how exactly you can reduce that number.
Remember, a law of economics is that supply always seeks to meet
demand. If we limit demand then we limit
supply. And when we consider that the
supply consists of human beings, each and every one of whom deserve dignity and
respect, then we should get to work. We
also see that sometimes a product can look so enticing that having a supply
creates demand, but that side of economics relates more to societal changes and
that comes later.
One quick lesson to take away with you, especially if you
don’t go to slaveryfootprint.org right after reading this: don’t upgrade your
cell phone. Or, at the very least, make
sure that you recycle your phone in a place that will properly reuse the parts
of the phone. All cell phones, the way
they are made today, require the use of a metal the mining of which, at the
moment, uses slave labor. Upgrade your
phone and don’t recycle the old one and you are using slave labor. Unless your current phone is broken, why do
you need to upgrade it anyway? What’s up
with that? Take better care of your cell
phone in the first place, too. Even if
we recycle our current phones, the rate at which we buy and upgrade our cell
phones is not sustainable using recycled product only. If it works, keep using it; if you’re behind
the times, so what? The “times” aren’t
so kind to 27 million slaves.
No comments:
Post a Comment